<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicken Little</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kidslit.menashalibrary.org/2009/04/03/chicken-little/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kidslit.menashalibrary.org/2009/04/03/chicken-little/</link>
	<description>Books for toddlers through teens, plus reading, writing and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:42:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carol Baicker-McKee</title>
		<link>http://kidslit.menashalibrary.org/2009/04/03/chicken-little/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Baicker-McKee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidslit.menashalibrary.org/2009/04/03/chicken-little/#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>Hi Tasha,
I love your wonderful blog, and I apologize for butting in with a non sequitur comment here. (Though I do also love the Emberley&#039;s work, and I will be sure to check out this book.)

I&#039;m a children’s book writer and illustrator. I’m on a mission to save vintage children&#039;s books, and I&#039;m trying to alert all the people who might care about them. Under a new U.S. law that went into effect in February (the CPSIA or toy lead law), it is now illegal to sell or give away (and technically also distribute from a library though ALA is advising libraries to wait and see if the law changes) any children&#039;s books printed in 1984 or earlier, with an exception for a small number of adult-only collectibles. The problem is that prior to 1985, there was sometimes a small amount of lead in the inks used to print books - but most books are lead-free and those that aren&#039;t are only dangerous to people who eat them. Nonetheless, there is no way to tell if a book is lead-free without using digestive testing, which is both expensive and destroys the book, so the old books aren&#039;t supposed to be sold.

You can learn more about this law and how it affects children&#039;s books at overlawyered.com, bookroomblog.com, heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com, amendthecpsia.com, and my blog, doodlesandnoodles.blogspot.com, as well as from articles in Publisher&#039;s Weekly (here&#039;s the link to the most recent article about it - you can get to their others from there: http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6648646.html?nid=2788)

Sorry for such a long, intrusive post. But if more people don&#039;t join the fight, old books are just going to gradually fade away. Congress so far is not interested in making any changes to the law.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tasha,<br />
I love your wonderful blog, and I apologize for butting in with a non sequitur comment here. (Though I do also love the Emberley&#8217;s work, and I will be sure to check out this book.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a children’s book writer and illustrator. I’m on a mission to save vintage children&#8217;s books, and I&#8217;m trying to alert all the people who might care about them. Under a new U.S. law that went into effect in February (the CPSIA or toy lead law), it is now illegal to sell or give away (and technically also distribute from a library though ALA is advising libraries to wait and see if the law changes) any children&#8217;s books printed in 1984 or earlier, with an exception for a small number of adult-only collectibles. The problem is that prior to 1985, there was sometimes a small amount of lead in the inks used to print books &#8211; but most books are lead-free and those that aren&#8217;t are only dangerous to people who eat them. Nonetheless, there is no way to tell if a book is lead-free without using digestive testing, which is both expensive and destroys the book, so the old books aren&#8217;t supposed to be sold.</p>
<p>You can learn more about this law and how it affects children&#8217;s books at overlawyered.com, bookroomblog.com, heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com, amendthecpsia.com, and my blog, doodlesandnoodles.blogspot.com, as well as from articles in Publisher&#8217;s Weekly (here&#8217;s the link to the most recent article about it &#8211; you can get to their others from there: <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6648646.html?nid=2788)" rel="nofollow">http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6648646.html?nid=2788)</a></p>
<p>Sorry for such a long, intrusive post. But if more people don&#8217;t join the fight, old books are just going to gradually fade away. Congress so far is not interested in making any changes to the law.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
